Blog Archive

Dcc garch bitcoin

Oct 12,  · Using intraday data, this study employs the VAR-DCC-GARCH model to examine return and volatility transmission among Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin during the pre-COVID and COVID periods. We find that the return spillovers differ across both periods for the Bitcoin-Ethereum, Bitcoin-Litecoin, and Ethereum-Litecoin ute-strohner.de: Imran Yousaf, Shoaib Ali. The results of the DCC-GARCH model identify an important effect of the launch of Bitcoin futures. During the stability period, the overarching implications of the results are that there is a persistence of correlation between cryptocurrencies in high positive value and low dynamic conditional correlations between cryptocurrencies and financial. Abstract: This paper examines the relationship of the leading financial assets, Bitcoin, Gold, and S&P with GARCH-Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC), Nonlinear Asymmetric GARCH DCC (NA-DCC), Gaussian copula-based GARCH-DCC (GC-DCC), and Gaussian copula-based Nonlinear.

Dcc garch bitcoin

This study examines the linkages between Bitcoin and other asset classes in the context of Turkey, which enables to draw generalizing conclusions. This study has led to subsequent findings. Firstly, the empirical results provide convincing evidence for the existence of a return spillover effect in the direction from the bond market to Bitcoin market, whereas a vice versa effect is not present.

One possible explanation is that profits from the more regular bond market are transferred to the unregulated Bitcoin market. Second, the findings show the existence of bidirectional cross-market shock and volatility spillover effect between Bitcoin and all other financial assets, with the exception of US Dollar. It is, however, important to underline that spillover effects are unidirectional from US Dollar to Bitcoin.

The results support the position that cryptocurrencies are regarded as a new investment asset class, since they are interconnected with each other, and have similar patterns of connectedness with other asset classes. When analyzing the return and volatility spillover effects in the framework of cryptocurrencies — specifically Bitcoin — the behavioral explanation is the most reasonable one since they are international, and also their value is not derived from any underlying economic and financial fundamental.

This study on the existence of volatility spillovers between Bitcoin and other traditional asset classes in a specific country context, Turkey, can therefore contribute to the current debate about the speculative nature of the cryptocurrencies.

It explores whether Bitcoin offers any diversification and risk management benefits for Turkish as well as international investors. Moreover, even if digital currencies are unregulated in many countries, some have effective regulatory frameworks and may have faster process for implementation of the regulations specific to the cryptocurrency market.

However, Turkey, as an emerging country with its stock and bond market providing high average returns and low correlation with developed markets, is attracting great interest from overseas investors.

Furthermore, fund manager and investors wary of using Bitcoin in portfolios due to the signs of correlation with the other asset classes Baek and Elbeck, ; Baur et al.

The continued rapid growth of Bitcoin and the unregulated nature of the market could create new vulnerabilities in the international financial system. Regulators and policy makers should, therefore, closely monitor the Bitcoin market and be aware of the return and volatility spillover effects among the Bitcoin market and other asset classes for selected and specific countries. The current study focuses on solely the spillover effects between Bitcoin and other asset classes in Turkey.

It may not be possible to generalize the results of the study to all other countries, since each has different investment alternatives and additionally, the characteristics and investment strategies of Turkish investors may differ from others. Further research should be done to explore the dynamics in different countries.

Additionally, with respect to the reported volatility interaction, it is interesting to expand the analysis for the observation of structural breaks in the level of correlation with the separation of high and low volatility periods and asymmetric leverage effect by using different volatility models.

Daily returns of the variables and the conditional variance of Bitcoin. Numbers in square brackets correspond to t -statistics.

Summary of estimated results for the conditional mean and conditional variance equations between bitcoin and selected financial assets.

Baek , C. Bariviera , A. Baur , D. Becker , J. Blau , B. Bouoiyour , J. Bouri , E. Brandvold , M. Briere , M. Buchholz , M. Chan , S. Chan , W. Cheah , E. Chourou , L. Ciaian , P. Corbet , S. Demir , E. Dwyer , G. Dyhrberg , A. Engle , R. Feng , W. Gajardo , G. Giudici , P. Gkillas , K. Glaser , F.

Gronwald , M. Guesmi , K. Katsiampa , P. Klashorst , B. Kokkinaki , A. Kristoufek , L. Nadarajah , S. Phillip , A. Pieters , G. Polasik , M. Rogojanu , A. Segendorf , B. Selgin , G. Selmi , R. Symitsi , E. Trabelsi , N. Urquhart , A. Yermack , D. Report bugs here. Please share your general feedback.

You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here. You can also find out more about Emerald Engage. Visit emeraldpublishing. Answers to the most commonly asked questions here.

Abstract Purpose With a substantial return and volatility characteristic of Bitcoin, which may be seen as a new category of investment assets, better understanding of the nature of return and volatility spillover can help investors and regulators in achieving the potential goal from portfolio diversification.

Findings The empirical results reveal the existence of the positive unilateral return spillovers from the bond market to Bitcoin market. Opens in a new window. Figure 1 Daily returns of the variables and the conditional variance of Bitcoin.

Due to the data availability of the Bitcoin price data, the starting date is July 19, Berna Aydogan can be contacted at: berna. Join us on our journey Platform update page Visit emeraldpublishing. Panel A — mean equation. Panel B — variance equation. Panel A — mean spillovers. Panel B — shock transmission. Panel C — volatility spillovers. In the empirical findings of this study, we examine the effect of the Fed's and ECB monetary policy announcements on the dynamic conditional correlation between Bitcoin and energy commodities returns.

The methodology utilized in this study is the DCC model introduced by Engle The data sample runs in the period from August 11, until March 31, Then, we use the approach proposed by Kuttner , which has been popular in the academic literature. Table 4 reports the descriptive statistics for the estimated dynamic conditional correlation between Bitcoin and energy commodities in presence of Fed surprises. This result implies the importance of these two commodities in the financial markets.

Also, this finding indicates the significance of the dynamic conditional correlation between Bitcoin and energy commodities mainly in the presence of Fed surprises.

In this case, we can observe the importance of the responsibility of US monetary policy in financial markets especially, for the energy commodity indices volatilities. However, Table 5 summarizes the descriptive statistics for the estimated dynamic conditional correlation between Bitcoin and energy commodities in the presence of ECB surprises. This result suggests the importance of these two commodities in the financial markets.

Also, this conclusion reveals the significance of the dynamic conditional correlation between Bitcoin and energy commodities mainly in the presence of ECB surprises. Additionally, from Table 4 and Table 5 , we can conclude that the Fed surprises are more important than the ECB surprises in operation of financial markets. From these figures, we can observe that the correlation between Bitcoin and energy commodities in the presence of Fed surprises is more important and significant than those in the presence of ECB surprises.

These findings confirm the conclusions shown in Table 4 and Table 5. Also, we can conclude that the dynamic conditional correlation between Bitcoin and energy commodities in the presence of Fed surprises contains more important peaks in positive and in negative than those issued from nexus between Bitcoin and energy commodities in the presence of ECB surprises.

In addition, and looking at the daily period, we can prove that surprise components in Federal funds target rate changes have played a crucial role in the developments of major energy commodities volatilities. This finding is not surprising. One potential justification is that given the essential effect of US economy on the global economy, the news regarding adjustments in US monetary policy may significantly influence foreign economic fundamentals and thus the volatility of energy markets.

Then, the lowest impact of ECB monetary policy is justified by the importance of the US strategies and the US investors to dominate the international financial markets and the global economy. More specifically, in all cases, the Fed monetary policy surprises have a significant impact on major energy commodities volatilities than the European monetary policy surprises.

Some interesting evidences appear from this estimation. First, we can observe that Fed surprises and ECB surprises affect the dynamic conditional correlation between Bitcoin and energy commodities similarly. This negative sign indicates that US and European monetary policies and shocks drop the mean level of volatility. In this case, we can observe the important difference between FOMC monetary policy and European monetary policy and their impact on the correlation between Bitcoin and energy commodities returns.

There is one probable clarification, which finds that such persistence goes along with the financialization of stock market indices, Bitcoin and energy commodities Creti et al. The links between Bitcoin and energy commodity markets have been examined by many researchers using various econometric methodologies. Several significant advancements have also been addressed in order to enrich the estimated findings.

Among these improvements, we can notice the presence of monetary policy surprises in the volatility models. These monetary policy surprises in volatility could be caused by country-specific economic and financial events, regional and global economic and financial events e. The empirical results in this paper suggest strong significant dynamic conditional correlations between Bitcoin and energy commodity markets if monetary policy surprises are incorporated in variance.

Finally, we assume that behavior of every commodity regarding Bitcoin fluctuations indicates the suggestion that commodities cannot be viewed as a homogeneous asset class. Our paper is a crucial topic for policymakers and portfolio risk managers. From a policymaking viewpoint, having precise estimates of the volatility spillovers throughout markets is an important step in formulating successful monetary policy decisions.

From the perspective of portfolio risk managers, our empirical findings are reliable with the idea of cross-market hedging. The returns of Bitcoin over the period from August 11, to March 31, The returns of Brent oil over the period from August 11, to March 31, The returns of heating oil over the period from August 11, to March 31, The returns of London gas oil over the period from August 11, to March 31, The returns of natural gas over the period from August 11, to March 31, The conditional volatilities of Bitcoin over the period from August 11, to March 31, The conditional volatilities of crude oil WTI over the period from August 11, to March 31, The conditional volatilities of Brent oil over the period from August 11, to March 31, The conditional volatilities of heating oil over the period from August 11, to March 31, The conditional volatilities of London gas oil over the period from August 11, to March 31, The conditional volatilities of natural gas over the period from August 11, to March 31, The data period is from August 11, until March 31, The sample period includes 42 Fed announcements and 21 ECB announcements.

We pursue Kuttner and define the mentioned surprises by applying the one-day change in the current-month futures rate. Target rate changes and surprises are calculated in basis points. Volatility and returns are measured in percent. Descriptive statistics for dynamic conditional correlation between Bitcoin and energy commodities with Fed surprises. Descriptive statistics for dynamic conditional correlation between bitcoin and energy commodities with ECB surprises.

Values in parentheses represent the t -Student. Andersen , T. Andreasson , P. Bailey , W. Balcilar , M. Balli , F. Basistha , A. Baur , D. Baumeister , C. S33 - S Bekiros , S. Berger , T. Bernanke , B. Brandvold , M. Chang , C. Chebbi , T. Chiou-Wei , S. Ciaian , P. Creti , A. Ehrmann , M. Engle , R. Gay , G. Goodhart , C. Halova , M. Hamilton , J. Hayo , B. Hui , B. Kang , S.

Karpoff , J. Kuttner , K. Lahmiri , S. Mensi , W. Miao , H. Narayan , P. Rajan , R. Rogojanu , A. Ross , S.

Shrestha , K. Wongswan , J. The authors would like to think the Editor in Chief and the anonymous reviewers for their supportive and important suggestions. The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees of the journal for their extremely useful suggestions to improve the quality of the paper. Report bugs here. Please share your general feedback. You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here. You can also find out more about Emerald Engage. Visit emeraldpublishing.

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here. Abstract Purpose This paper provides an important perspective to the predictive capacity of Fed and European Central Bank ECB meeting dates and production announcements for the dynamic conditional correlation DCC between Bitcoin and energy commodities returns and volatilities during the period from August 11, to March 31, Opens in a new window.

Figure 1 The returns of Bitcoin over the period from August 11, to March 31, Figure 3 The returns of Brent oil over the period from August 11, to March 31, Figure 5 The returns of heating oil over the period from August 11, to March 31, Figure 6 The returns of London gas oil over the period from August 11, to March 31, Figure 7 The returns of natural gas over the period from August 11, to March 31, Figure 8 The conditional volatilities of Bitcoin over the period from August 11, to March 31, Figure 10 The conditional volatilities of Brent oil over the period from August 11, to March 31, Figure 12 The conditional volatilities of heating oil over the period from August 11, to March 31, Figure 13 The conditional volatilities of London gas oil over the period from August 11, to March 31, Figure 14 The conditional volatilities of natural gas over the period from August 11, to March 31, Dev 0.

Dev Abdelkader Derbali can be contacted at: derbaliabdelkader outlook. Join us on our journey Platform update page Visit emeraldpublishing. Crude oil wti. Brent oil. Gasoline RBOB.

Heating oil. London gas oil.

Investigating the relationship between volatilities of cryptocurrencies and other financial assets Introduction

Abstract: This paper examines the relationship of the leading financial assets, Bitcoin, Gold, and S&P with GARCH-Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC), Nonlinear Asymmetric GARCH DCC (NA-DCC), Gaussian copula-based GARCH-DCC (GC-DCC), and Gaussian copula-based Nonlinear. Jun 01,  · Dyhrberg (a) and Dyhrberg (b) acknowledge that bitcoin has a place in the financial markets and portfolio management as it can be classified as something in between gold and the American dollar. Bitcoin can thus be utilized as a hedge against stocks in the Financial Times Stock Exchange Index and the American dollar (for the short-term).Cited by: The results of the DCC-GARCH model identify an important effect of the launch of Bitcoin futures. During the stability period, the overarching implications of the results are that there is a persistence of correlation between cryptocurrencies in high positive value and low dynamic conditional correlations between cryptocurrencies and financial. Tags:Debit card bitcoin atm, Uk bitcoin share price, Bitcoin handelen tips, Binance iost btc, Btc-republic

0 thoughts on “Dcc garch bitcoin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *