Mar 11, · He had launched a project with the vision to create a Bitcoin-based utopia based on Walt Disney’s Tomorrowland. Called “Bitcointopia”, it was meant to be “the desert crypto-kingdom of the future” built out in the Nevada desert. currency Bitcoin is a donating platform using Internet-connected a mining project that got the Bronze Badge specifically for ASiC processors based on calculations that ute-strohner.de BitCoin Utopia went Gridcoin Research on Coin). Several users complained about bitcoin utopia in the cryptocointalk announcement thread and a poll was created prior to topics being created discussing the vote. Does the project have sufficient work units for team Gridcoin to all participate in the project? (Check the project's ute-strohner.de page).
Bitcoin utopia projectNew SETI@home donation project on Bitcoin Utopia
It was nice not to need to dip into cash to replace them. SETI apps news We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them. No numbers on that that I know of. Though asic is the only way to go. All else would be a total waste, doubly so.
No real contribution and wasted other opportunities. Sorry, if you want to help you need to have ASIC miner. Please check eBay, AliExpress or any other similar sites, you should find some nice miners there. Make sure they are at least 1GH or faster, there are many slower ones there. How does an old guy running Windows 8. Unable to find the Bitcoin task on the Project list. You're right. That's a pity. I run a cluster with more than 3, cores, including a stack of GPU blades.
That will be doubling in the next few weeks.. According to local state daily the Los Angeles Times Mar 8 , Rockcoons had advertised Bitcoin to fiat exchange services openly online back in although he did not possess a money transmission license.
This attracted the attention of the authorities which busted him in a operation when an undercover agent posed as a hash oil manufacturer looking to buy Bitcoin to purchase equipment. US federal law currently considers crypto exchange services to be the same as money transmitters. Various states have been divided, however, on how crypto exchanges should be treated as with regards to money transmission.
The three sites all collect and aggregate their data at different times of the day, and monitor a different number of projects between 67 and But all of that was wildly different interpretations of the Bitcoin Utopia phenomenon, which the three sites were displaying as 6. Looking in particular at the 'Top ' page, I thing we can identify visually that Collatz, DRTG and PrimeGrid are other high-paying integer math projects I'm not sure why DRTG shows so strongly - it seems to have been offline for the last couple of months.
SETI and Einstein have large numbers of computers attached: GPUGrid certainly does a lot of floating point maths, but I think rather overstate the work done by their credit awards. I could see no sign of any large-scale input from the sort of Uppercase project that Jord describes.
If we leave out those three big integer projects, then BOINC's overall floating-point computing power comes out at 4. It's a software developed by Berkely University for volunteer computing over the internet. If somebody wants to volunteer their computer for a non-science project, that's their choice. BOINC credits don't really mean anything.
It's just a statistic. Different projects give out different amounts of credit for tasks completed. You don't really get anything from it; if anything it's just a way of saying how much work you've done. I think it's a good idea to make a sort of "ethics commetees" to evaluate the projects and to ban, if necessary. To generate and give funding to projects.
I do appreciate that. It is a research? BOINC credits shouldn't be awarded especially in exchange of money donations, as every project has a special place for their money donors on their homepages, still none of them gives BOINC credits for money.
I my opinion that would be a shame if they would. Now the BitCoin Utopia project made that shame routine. I do no know think they are breaking any rule or anything along those lines but I do believe that with the credit granted they do appear to have quite a great value. This is a bit ridiculous it is a good way to alienate allot of donors from boinc BOINC credits don't really mean anything.
They may not have a value to you but to many they do, I am not ashamed to look at the stats an see how I am doing compared to every body else out there, and I do take pride in seeing the assigned credit value of my contribution to the Boinc projects.
All of my contribution is out of pocket there are no company funds or anything like that. According to the amount of credit I receive for my contribution my contribution of cores and 4 GPU's to the Boinc project has become pretty minuscule compared to 1 ASIC miner.
I personally feel that my equipment is no longer wanted or needed in the Boinc projects and has been belittled by the amount of credit Bitcoin Utopia receives and to add to the rejection the ASIC miners are doing nothing as far as far as science goes, which is irrelevant but will affect my decision in the long run.
I will not choose to run it, it is not my cup of tea, so I will have a choice to make somewhere down the line. I will tell you now that the 3rd choice does not give me a warm and fuzzy feeling so that leaves 1 and 2 Anyway the statement that Boinc credits do not really mean anything may apply to you to to many of us out there in Bionc Land they do mean something and right at the moment by looking at the stats they mean the Boinc projects do not need any CPU's but they really need some ASIC miners.
In my opinion either the credit should be removed from Boinc stats and put in its own separate category outside of Boinc stats. I personally feel that my equipment is no longer wanted or needed in the Boinc projects I agree completely.
They are too old to accept decent GPUs, so now when they die I don't bother to repair them, I just throw them away. Depressing, isn't it? On the bright side though if more work is being done by GPUs even if not by me that's got to be a Good Thing. The whole credit thing is a red herring when in comes to cross-project comparisons. The best thing to do is just stop exporting stats.
Just kill that function in the next BOINC server version, the stats sites will all be frozen in time, and everybody will be happy.
Seriously, trust me on this.